The Ophiostomatales was erected in 1980. Since that time, several of the genera have been redefined and others have been described. There are currently 14 accepted genera in the Order. They include species that are the causal agents of plant and human diseases and common associates of insects such as bark beetles. Well known examples include the Dutch elm disease fungi and the causal agents of sporotrichosis in humans and animals. The taxonomy of the Ophiostomatales was confused for many years, mainly due to the convergent evolution of morphological characters used to delimit unrelated fungal taxa. The emergence of DNA-based methods has resolved much of this confusion. However, the delineation of some genera and the placement of various species and smaller lineages remains inconclusive. In this study we reconsidered the generic boundaries within the Ophiostomatales . A phylogenomic framework constructed from genome-wide sequence data for 31 species representing the major genera in the Order was used as a guide to delineate genera. This framework also informed our choice of the best markers from the currently most commonly used gene regions for taxonomic studies of these fungi. DNA was amplified and sequenced for more than 200 species, representing all lineages in the Order. We constructed phylogenetic trees based on the different gene regions and assembled a concatenated data set utilising a suite of phylogenetic analyses. The results supported and confirmed the delineation of nine of the 14 currently accepted genera, i.e. Aureovirgo, Ceratocystiopsis, Esteya, Fragosphaeria, Graphilbum, Hawksworthiomyces, Ophiostoma, Raffaelea and Sporothrix . The two most recently described genera, Chrysosphaeria and Intubia , were not included in the multi-locus analyses. This was due to their high sequence divergence, which was shown to result in ambiguous taxonomic placement, even though the results of phylogenomic analysis supported their inclusion in the Ophiostomatales . In addition to the currently accepted genera in the Ophiostomatales , well-supported lineages emerged that were distinct from those genera. These are described as novel genera. Two lineages included the type species of Grosmannia and Dryadomyces and these genera are thus reinstated and their circumscriptions redefined. The descriptions of all genera in the Ophiostomatales were standardised and refined where this was required and 39 new combinations have been provided for species in the newly emerging genera and one new combination has been provided for Sporothrix . The placement of Afroraffaelea could not be confirmed using the available data and the genus has been treated as incertae sedis in the Ophiostomatales . Paleoambrosia was not included in this study, due to the absence of living material available for this monotypic fossil genus. Overall, this study has provided the most comprehensive and robust phylogenies currently possible for the Ophiostomatales . It has also clarified several unresolved One Fungus-One Name nomenclatural issues relevant to the Order. Taxonomic novelties: New genera: Harringtonia Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter, Heinzbutinia Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter, Jamesreidia Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter, Masuyamyces Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter. New species: Masuyamyces massonianae M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer. New combinations: Dryadomyces montetyi (M. Morelet) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Dryadomyces quercivorus (Kubono & Shin. Ito) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Dryadomyces quercus-mongolicae (K.H. Kim et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Dryadomyces sulphureus (L.R. Batra) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Graphilbum pusillum (Masuya) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia abieticolens (K. Jacobs & M.J. Wingf.) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia altior (Paciura et al .) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia betulae (Jankowiak et al .) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia curviconidia (Paciura et al .) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia euphyes (K. Jacobs & M.J. Wingf.) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia fenglinhensis (R. Chang et al .) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia gestamen (de Errasti & Z.W. de Beer) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia innermongolica (X.W. Liu et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia pistaciae (Paciura et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia pruni (Masuya & M.J. Wingf.) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia taigensis (Linnak. et al .) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Grosmannia trypodendri (Jankowiak et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Harringtonia aguacate (D.R. Simmons et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Harringtonia brunnea (L.R. Batra) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Harringtonia lauricola (T.C. Harr. et al. ) Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter, Heinzbutinia grandicarpa (Kowalski & Butin) Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter, Heinzbutinia microspora (Arx) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Heinzbutinia solheimii (B. Strzałka & Jankowiak) Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter, Jamesreidia coronata (Olchow. & J. Reid) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Jamesreidia nigricarpa (R.W. Davidson) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Jamesreidia rostrocoronata (R.W. Davidson & Eslyn) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Jamesreidia tenella (R.W. Davidson) Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter, Leptographium cainii (Olchow. & J. Reid) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Leptographium europioides (E.F. Wright & Cain) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Leptographium galeiforme (B.K. Bakshi) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Leptographium pseudoeurophioides (Olchow. & J. Reid) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Leptographium radiaticola (J.J. Kim et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Masuyamyces acarorum (R. Chang & Z.W. de Beer) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Masuyamyces ambrosius (B.K. Bakshi) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Masuyamyces botuliformis (Masuya) Z.W. de Beer & M. Procter, Masuyamyces jilinensis (R. Chang et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Masuyamyces lotiformis (Z. Wang & Q. Lu) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Masuyamyces pallidulus (Linnak. et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Masuyamyces saponiodorus (Linnak. et al. ) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer, Sporothrix longicollis (Massee & E.S. Salmon) M. Procter & Z.W. de Beer. Citation: de Beer W, Procter M, Wingfield MJ, Marincowitz S, Duong TA (2022). Generic boundaries in the Ophiostomatales reconsidered and revised. Studies in Mycology 101 : 57-120. doi: 10.3114/sim.2022.101.02.

Makaleyi görüntüle

Leaf anatomical traits play key roles in plant functions and display evolutionary adaptive changes to suit the surrounding environment. To reveal the adaptive mode and mechanisms of plants in response to global warming, we analyzed leaf morphology and anatomical structures in three different species, Epilobium amurense Hausskn., Pedicularis densispica Franch., and Potentilla fulgens Wall. ex Hook., growing along an elevational gradient (3,000-4,600 m) in the Yulong Mountains. The results showed leaf length and width decreased, whereas leaf thickness increased with increasing altitude in all three species. Thickness of leaf upper epidermis, lower epidermis, palisade and spongy mesophyll, and main vein increased with rising altitude. Stomatal density in each species increased with rising elevation. These results illustrate that plants can adapt to the environmental changes that accompany high altitudes by decreasing leaf area and increasing leaf thickness, mesophyll tissue thickness, and stomatal density. Such morphological and anatomical plasticity would lead to lower transpiration rates, enhanced internal temperature and water status, and improved photosynthetic capability.

Makaleyi görüntüle

2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol or 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-phenol (2,4-DTBP) is a common toxic secondary metabolite produced by various groups of organisms. The biosources and bioactivities of 2,4-DTBP have been well investigated, but the phenol has not been systematically reviewed. This article provides a comprehensive review of 2,4-DTBP and its analogs with emphasis on natural sources and bioactivities. 2,4-DTBP has been found in at least 169 species of bacteria (16 species, 10 families), fungi (11 species, eight families), diatom (one species, one family), liverwort (one species, one family), pteridiphyta (two species, two families), gymnosperms (four species, one family), dicots (107 species, 58 families), monocots (22 species, eight families), and animals (five species, five families). 2,4-DTBP is often a major component of violate or essential oils and it exhibits potent toxicity against almost all testing organisms, including the producers; however, it is not clear why organisms produce autotoxic 2,4-DTBP and its analogs. The accumulating evidence indicates that the endocidal regulation seems to be the primary function of the phenols in the producing organisms.

Makaleyi görüntüle

Vegetation restoration has been widely used in karst rocky desertification (KRD) areas of southwestern China, but the response of microbial community to revegetation has not been well characterized. We investigated the diversity, structure, and co-occurrence patterns of bacterial communities in soils of five vegetation types (grassland, shrubbery, secondary forest, pure plantation and mixed plantation) in KRD area using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Bray-Curtis dissimilarity analysis revealed that 15 bacterial community samples were clustered into five groups that corresponded very well to the five vegetation types. Shannon diversity was positively correlated with pH and Ca 2+ content but negatively correlated with organic carbon, total nitrogen, and soil moisture. Redundancy analysis indicated that soil pH, Ca 2+ content, organic carbon, total nitrogen, and soil moisture jointly influenced bacterial community structure. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed non-random assembly patterns of bacterial composition in the soils. Bryobacter , GR-WP33-30, and Rhizomicrobium were identified as keystone genera in co-occurrence network. These results indicate that diverse soil physicochemical properties and potential interactions among taxa during vegetation restoration may jointly affect the bacterial community structure in KRD regions.

Makaleyi görüntüle

Altitudinal gradients are characterized by steep changes of the physical and biotic environment that present challenges to plant adaptation throughout large parts of the world. Hybrid zones may form where related species inhabit different neighbouring altitudes and can facilitate interspecific gene flow and potentially the breakdown of species barriers. Studies of such hybrid zones can reveal much about the genetic basis of adaptation to environmental differences stemming from changes in altitude and the maintenance of species divergence in the face of gene flow. Furthermore, owing to recombination and transgressive effects, such hybrid zones can be sources of evolutionary novelty. We document plant hybrid zones associated with altitudinal gradients and emphasize similarities and differences in their structure. We then focus on recent studies of a hybrid zone between two Senecio species that occur at high and low altitude on Mount Etna, Sicily, showing how adaptation to local environments and intrinsic selection against hybrids act to maintain it. Finally, we consider the potential of altitudinal hybrid zones for generating evolutionary novelty through adaptive introgression and hybrid speciation. Examples of homoploid hybrid species of Senecio and Pinus that originated from altitudinal hybrid zones are discussed.

Makaleyi görüntüle